There’s been an argument raging between columnists in the Guardian (a UK newspaper). It was said by Jonathan Jones, and i’m paraphrasing, that a photograph isn’t art. This isn’t a new sentiment and is an argument pretty much as old as the camera itself. Jones argues that it’s not a creative act but a testament to ease of which we can take good photographs with the technology we now have access too. He seems annoyed by the sale of Peter Lik’s photograph of a canyon for $6.5m.

My response would falls along the same lines as response by Michael McIntyre when told his comedy is easy; “What I’d like to say to these people is, if it’s so easy then why don’t you do it? … I have a great life. It’s going really well for me. The house is looking great. We go on really nice holidays. You can have some of that. If it’s so f—ing easy.”
So, Jonathan Jones – Let’s see you snap away and make millions too. Oh, it’s not that easy is it? No.
Reference: Guardian Article.
He says and I quote "My iPad can take panoramic views that are gorgeous to look at. Does that make me an artist? No, it just makes my tablet one hell of a device." So does this mean his word processor takes all the credit for his articles? Such a narrow and blinkered point of view, it is surprising that anyone can be like that!!!!!
Si